Difference Between Compiler and Interpreter
Difference Between Compiler and Interpreter
Compilers and interpreters are important in programming because they convert high-level code into instructions meaningful to a machine. Although they both serve the purpose of executing code, they differ quite significantly in their workings. A compiler processes the complete source code in one go, translating the source code into machine code first and running the program afterwards. On the other hand, an interpreter processes the code line by line. This article discusses the major differences between compilers and interpreters and examines how they affect program execution.
What is a Compiler?
A compiler covers all aspects of a program, the core basis of software development, and transforms humanly created high-level programming code into machine instructions. The output is conventionally binary as well as machine code and continues auxiliary phases like lexical analysis, syntax, and semantic checks, code optimization, and generation. The outcome is a performable code that is functional to one’s hardware. But before delving into the differences exhibited by computers and interpreters, one needs to understand the process of compilers.
How Does the Compiler Work?
A compiler works in multiple stages. First, it checks the source code concerning the syntax rules of a programming language. Next, it translates the code into some intermediate representation and applies various optimizations. Finally, it produces machine code that is optimized for efficient running. The result is an executable that is given to the machine for running.
Types of Compilers
Compilers are categorized based on the output types and competing circumstances. A classification of the same is given here:
Single-Pass and Multi-Pass Compilers
Single-pass compilers analyze and affect the translation of the source code in one go. On the contrary, a multi-pass compiler processes its code through several stages, which allows for even more optimizations to be performed. This, however, takes longer and consumes more memory than a single-pass compiler.
Translators, Source-to-Source Compilers
These tools provide code translation across languages to ease codebase migration or platform compatibility.
Cross Compilers
They are useful to coders because they create programs for systems or architectures other than the one for which the compiler is running.
Native Compilers
True to its name, a native compiler compiles a given source program into machine code for the same computer system.
Just-In-Time Compiler (JIT)
JIT compilers compile the required machine code during the execution of programs, mostly in Java or .NET environments, thereby combining compilation and interpretation.
Ahead-of-Time Compiler (AOT)
Such compilers translate the whole program to machine code before being run, assuring a faster startup and dependable performance.
Optimizing Compilers
Optimizing compilers employ several different methods to obtain more efficient executable code and thereby improve code execution performance, such as constant folding, loop unrolling, and inlining functions.
Compilers As Interpreters
These work in a manner much akin to interpreters, processing code line by line and executing it immediately.
Dynamic Compiler
Dynamic compilers operate on the fly for emulators and virtual environments, referring to the process of translation from one instruction set to another.
Incremental Compilers
Incremental Compilers are designed to recompile only the sections of source code that have been changed. Thus, they save time during development since they do not require recompiling unaltered code as well.
Bootstrap Compilers
Bootstrap compilers are those written in the language they are supposed to compile. They are usually a base for building self-compiling systems.
Why Decompiler?
Decompilers perform the inverse of compilation, converting machine-level code back into human-readable high-level code, with exceptions, of course, about the original code.
Language Rewriting
Language rewrite tools take source code in one language and convert it into another for improved readability, compatibility, or portability.
Bytecode Compiler
It compiles source code into bytecode, an intermediate form executed by virtual machines like the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) or Python Virtual Machine (PVM).
Assemblers
Assemblers transform assembly code, a more human-readable representation of machine instructions, directly into executable machine code.
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Compiler
Advantages of a compiler
- Once the code is compiled, the machine code will go undiluted and run directly on the system, resulting in faster execution than in interpreted languages.
- While carrying out this translation, compilers also apply optimizations to produce more efficient code that runs faster.
- The compiler analyzes the entire code before its execution. Thus, it can catch and report errors that arise early in the development process.
- The generated machine code can be optimized by the compiler for the underlying hardware on which the program will run, enhancing performance.
- Since compilers generate binary files, the source code is rendered more difficult to reverse-engineer or be accessed by unauthorized parties.
Disadvantages of a compiler
The time taken to compile big programs slows the development and testing process.
A compiled code is platform-specific, meaning the program has to be recompiled for different hardware or operating systems.
Compilers tend to create large executable files, which can consume more memory than interpreted programs.
What is an Interpreter?
An interpreter is a program that executes high-level programming code directly without converting it into machine code ahead of time. The interpreter processes the code one line at a time, translating it and executing that line of code sequentially. Such immediate execution helps to quickly detect and rectify errors as it makes the debugging process easier.
How Does the Interpreter Work?
An interpreter operates by reading and running high-level programming code directly without converting it into machine code beforehand. It processes the code one line at a time, translating each line into machine instructions just before executing it. This step-by-step execution allows for easier detection and correction of errors, simplifying the debugging process.
Types of Interpreters
Interpreters are classified into several types based on how they function and the environments they serve:
Sequential Interpreters
These execute code line by line in the order they appear, maintaining a straightforward execution flow.
Interactive Interpreters
Designed for real-time interaction, these interpreters let users input and run code instantly, offering immediate results—ideal for experimenting and learning.
Batch Interpreters
Batch interpreters are commonly used for running complete scripts or instruction sets at once in automation and task scheduling.
Bytecode Interpreters
They first convert source code into intermediate bytecode and then interpret it during execution, offering a balance between speed and flexibility.
Just-In-Time (JIT) Interpreters
Blending interpretation with compilation, JIT interpreters translate parts of the code into machine language on the fly to improve runtime efficiency.
Tree-Walk Interpreters
These interpreters construct an abstract syntax tree (AST) from the code and then walk through it to carry out operations.
Source-to-Source Interpreters
They convert code from one high-level language to another rather than directly executing it, supporting code migration and compatibility.
Hardware Interpreters
Some systems include specialized hardware support to execute specific language instructions more efficiently than traditional software interpreters.
Emulators and Virtual Machine Interpreters
These simulate an entire hardware or software platform, allowing programs to run as if they were in their original environment.
Dynamic Translators
Working like emulators, these translate instructions from one system to another in real-time to allow cross-platform functionality.
Domain-Specific Interpreters
Tailored for particular fields or applications, these interpreters serve specialized programming needs.
Concurrent Interpreters
They support the simultaneous execution of various code segments, leveraging multi-core processing for improved performance.
Threaded Code Interpreters
This type uses addresses of pre-compiled code segments, jumping directly to these addresses during runtime—ideal for repeated tasks.
AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) Interpreters
These interpreters build an AST from the source code, representing its structure, and then evaluate the tree step-by-step to execute the program.
Advantages and Disadvantages of an Interpreter
Advantages of an Interpreter
Interpreters translate the code line by line, enabling rapid testing and easier debugging without compilation.
Usually, interpreted code is portable across systems due to its independence on any specific hardware architecture.
Errors are thrown and caught on the throw the instant they are thrown. This helps developers trace and eliminate problems apparent in the code.
It doesn’t load the entire program into memory; the interpreter uses less memory to execute instructions, i.e., it executes the instructions one after another.
Thus, these tools are compatible with dynamically typed languages in terms of more flexibility during runtime.
Disadvantages of Interpreters
Programs that are interpreted at run time generally execute more slowly than compiled ones since every line must be processed immediately.
The interpreters do not perform very deep optimizations while executing, so performance is not as good as that of their compiled counterparts.
The main problem with interpreters is that they require the source code to be on the same machine on which it runs, and thus, they can produce issues of distribution and security.
What is the Difference Between a Compiler and an Interpreter?
| Aspect | Compiler | Interpreter |
| Execution Process | It translates the entire program into machine code at once. | It translates and executes code line by line. |
| Output | The compiler generates an executable file (machine code). | The interpreter directly executes the program without creating a separate file. |
| Error Detection | It detects all errors after completing the whole program. | It detects and reports errors line by line, stopping at the first error. |
| Speed of Execution | It is generally faster because the entire program is precompiled. | It is usually slower, as it translates code during execution. |
| Memory Usage | It requires more memory to store the compiled code. | It uses less memory as no executable file is generated. |
| Reusability | Compiled code can be executed multiple times without recompilation. | On the contrary, the Interpreter needs to re-execute the code each time. |
| Examples | C, C++, Java (JVM bytecode compiled programs) | Python, Ruby, JavaScript |
| Use case | It is suitable for performance-critical applications. | It is ideal for scripting, development, and dynamic execution. |
Conclusion
We hope this article drew a bright line between compiler and interpreter. If you wish to upskill yourself in software development, the Full Stack Developer-MERN Stack program from Simplilearn can provide a stepping stone. Designed with IIT Madras, this flexible course will prepare you with the key skills to make you industry-ready. You will learn how to design, develop, and scale frontend and backend systems. You will also gain hands-on experience with more than 10 industry-relevant tools and frameworks, working on over 6 real-world projects, all in a study-friendly learning system of online live classes and an integrated lab environment.
Post Comment